Comments on: Read Pak Lah’s lip, “However poor we are, we should not make our (Chinese) education poor.” http://chow.blogsome.com/2006/06/06/read-pak-lahs-lip-however-poor-we-are-we-should-not-make-our-chinese-education-poor/ Tanjong Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:55:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: Taja Enjok http://chow.blogsome.com/2006/06/06/read-pak-lahs-lip-however-poor-we-are-we-should-not-make-our-chinese-education-poor/#comment-336 Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:36:57 +0100 http://chow.blogsome.com/2006/06/06/read-pak-lahs-lip-however-poor-we-are-we-should-not-make-our-chinese-education-poor/#comment-336 Euclid (Greek Mathematician, academician) once told Ptolemy (King of Egypt, political power) there are 2 roads in the real world; one for the King (the royal road) and one for the commoner. In Geometry (education) there is only one road. The King and commoner have to use this road. "There is no Royal Road to geometry". Is there any analogy to our Malaysian Eduacation system? Euclid (Greek Mathematician, academician) once told Ptolemy (King of Egypt, political power) there are 2 roads in the real world; one for the King (the royal road) and one for the commoner.

In Geometry (education) there is only one road. The King and commoner have to use this road. “There is no Royal Road to geometry”. Is there any analogy to our Malaysian Eduacation system?

]]>