Chow Kon Yeow: 曹观友

PenangSaturday, 01-07-2006 14: 20.19

Yes, Georgetown is a town, not a city yet.

Penang Chief Minister Dr Koh Tsu Koon said in 1999 that Penang would apply for city status for Georgetown and Butterworth. But till today, Georgetown and Butterworth are still towns because no application from the State Government has been received by the Ministry of Housing and Local Government.

I have asked the Housing and Local Government Ministry in Parliament on Thursday why the city status has not been conferred on Georgetown.

The Ministry replied that they have not received any application from the Penang State Government.

Georgetown was actually accorded city status by Queen Elizabeth before Independence. It was the country’s first city. It was administered by the Georgetown City Council and headed by a mayor. Areas outside the council’s jurisdiction came under the Rural District Council.

However, in the 1970s, the city council and district council merged into one body, the Penang Island Municipal Council. However, Georgetown’s city status was not revoked.

We may not be a Malaysian city, but certainly a colonial one.

Whenever any town is elevated to city status, we would ask when Georgetown would be given city status. Georgetown could not be worst than other recently- elevated cities in the country.

Well, it seems that Dr Koh Tsu Koon has not kept his promise. Over to you, Tsu Koon.

Religion 14: 18.34

Temple destructions recently call for great concern among Malaysians. This adds on to the many problems faced by multi-religious Malaysia.This is not something new, but unless and until it is addressed, it would be a source for inter-ethnic problem.
DAP MP for Ipoh Barat M.Kulasegaran has submitted an adjournment speech to highlight this issue in Parliament.Hopefully, the authorities would see fit to resolve the problem.

Farish A Noor expressed his view on the matter. It is carried in today’s edition of the Daily Times, Pakistan.

Saturday, July 01, 2006

VIEW: Temple destruction a loss for Malaysian identity —Farish A Noor

The bottom line is that the Hindu temples of Malaysia are and have always been part of the Malaysian cultural landscape. Hinduism is one of the Malaysian faiths. It has been rooted in the culture of Southeast Asia for more than 2,000 years. If anything, its long historical embeddedness shows that it deserves more than a token mention in the history books

Religion’s entry into politics often leads to its politicisation and loss of its core spiritual values. This is painfully obvious to the scholars who have watched the rise of political variants of Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism and Buddhism the world over. This has led many an analyst to the somewhat depressing conclusion that despite its lofty ideals religion has yet to develop immunity to the temptation of power. Since every religion is understood and judged by the actions and behaviour of its adherents, it is clear that Muslims, Christians, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists are often themselves the reason why these religions get such bad press these days.

Given the aggravated tensions, the contradiction becomes all the more blatant in the context of multi-confessional nations where the battle for hearts and minds often leads to a competition for converts. Being perhaps one of the most multicultural and multi-religious countries in the world today, Malaysia, is a good starting point. Since the advent of the ‘Islamisation race’ that took off in the 1970s, there has been a sustained campaign to win over more non-Muslims to Islam, and vice versa. Only recently it was revealed that in the northern state of Kelantan, ruled by the Malaysian opposition Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS), the state government will offer cash and other rewards to Muslims who marry non-Muslim aborigines and convert them to Islam. One wonders where this will lead. Perhaps multiple conversions ‘bonuses’ for Muslim men who take several non-Muslim wives.

To complicate things, there is a simultaneous neglect of other faith communities and their places of worship and congregation. Over the past two decades a long list of complaints has been compiled by representatives of the Christian, Hindu and Buddhist communities: Permits for the construction of churches and temples have often been delayed, if not denied. On top of that there is the complaint that Hindu temples have been demolished, often on the pretext of ‘development’ but also because they were ‘too small’ for sizeable congregations or there were not enough Hindus living nearby to justify them. One wonders if the same line of argument would be used by the (mostly Muslim) officials in cases of isolated mosques not close to large Muslim settlements.

Malaysia’s Hindus are one of its many doubly disadvantaged communities. First, they belong to the Indian minority, marginalised for a long time on account of its so-called ‘immigrant status’. (This is discriminatory because most Malays also have ancestors who came from places in Indonesia or Thailand.) Second, many of them belong to the poorer section of the Indian community, having been brought to Malaysia during the British colonial era as plantation workers and labourers who helped build the railway system that today connects much of the country. It is sad that this community has been relegated to the margins and remains on the threshold of Malaysian citizenship and national identity. Hinduism is recognised as one of the faiths in Malaysia, yet the plight of so many Hindu temples goes unrecorded in the country’s media, save for a few independent newspapers like Malaysiakini.com.

Fortunately globalisation may stand in the way of the rampant destruction of Hindu places of worship. While such demolition may have gone unnoticed in the past, today the Malaysian Hindu community is wired up to the global Hindu Diaspora. Since the beginning of this year, representatives of various Malaysian Hindu organisations have started seeking help from Hindu communities overseas. The Internet and other tools of global communication have helped ensure that the destruction of temples does not go unnoticed. Thus far, the response has been impressive, with Hindu organisations in Europe and other parts of the world appealing to the Malaysian government and the prime minister to do something to stop the march of the bulldozers.

The onus for living up to its image and slogan as a country that is ‘truly Asia’ lies with Malaysia. Under the banner of ‘Islam Hadari’, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has projected a vision of Malaysia as the bastion of moderate progressive Islam. The emphasis of this school of Islamic norms and praxis has been on bringing to foreground the civilisational aspect of Islam as a way of life that is tolerant, plural, dynamic and sensitive to the needs of the times. Perhaps the time has come for the ideologues of the Malaysian state to put their words into practice and show just how tolerant and pluralist this vision of Islam is.

The bottom line is that the Hindu temples of Malaysia are and have always been part of the Malaysian cultural landscape. Hinduism is one of the Malaysian faiths. It has been rooted in the culture of Southeast Asia for more than 2,000 years. If anything, its long historical embeddedness shows that it deserves more than a token mention in the history books. Most importantly it has to be remembered that in the constitution of the Malaysian nation and its identity, Hinduism is not something ulterior, alien or foreign to the country. The Hindu temples of Malaysia are part of the things that make Malaysia what it is. For that reason Malaysians of all races and religions should decry the demolition of these buildings as destruction of their culture. Those temples are not from Mars or another world: they are Malaysian, down to their foundations.

Dr Farish A Noor is a Malaysian political scientist and human rights activist, based at the Zentrum Moderner Orient (ZMO), Berlin